North Texas Daily

New voices speak on immigration reform

New voices speak on immigration reform

April 02
21:30 2013

The following editorial appeared in the Houston Chronicle on April 1, 2013. 

As a Mexican-American living in the Southwest who writes frequently about immigration, my definition of what constitutes harsh language is probably a bit skewed.

Recently, after I defended Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, a reader in San Antonio – a self-described liberal Democrat – advised me to “get your head out of your menudo, Señor.”

I’d say that qualifies as harsh.

Lawrence Downes, an editorial writer for The New York Times, apparently is more easily offended. For him, the tone of the book “Immigration Wars,” co-authored by Jeb Bush and Clint Bolick is “unequivocally harsh.”

What bothers liberals like Downes is that Bush seems to have changed his mind about whether 11 million illegal immigrants should get not only legal status but also a path to citizenship. All of this is on the table as the U.S. Senate’s “gang of eight” prepares to unveil its immigration reform bill in early April.

Of course, what really bothers liberals is that Bush may run for president in 2016 and that he likely would attract Latino support. So it behooves liberals to try to paint him as an immigration hard-liner.

Still, it won’t be an easy trick to accomplish for those who actually bother to read the book.

In the preface, Bush says this about his Mexican-born wife, Columba: “Thanks to my wife, I became bicultural and bilingual, and my life is better because of it.” And this: “In order to restore sustained, economic growth going forward, we need a new immigration strategy that opens our doors to young, aspirational people from around the world, so that they can pursue their dreams in our country.”

Meanwhile, Bolick writes about the farmworkers he met years ago: “I recognized in their weathered, callused hands the same dirt-caked fingernails I had seen on my father’s hands. … I came to believe that we should not be looking for ways to keep people like those farmworkers out of our country. We should be looking for ways to bring them in.” And this: “I frequently have parted company with many of my fellow conservatives over immigration issues.”

In fact, the more I read of the book, the less I saw the similarity between what the co-authors were saying and what the media wanted us to think they were saying.

Bolick noticed this too.

“The interviews had more to do with the media trying to sabotage any political plans that Jeb Bush might develop than with what we were saying,” he told me. “It was very difficult to get the heart of the message out.”

I was also interested in how conservative audiences are reacting to the book, since the co-authors don’t pull punches with their own tribe.

“The reaction from right-wing groups was much more positive than I expected,” Bolick said. “People had no idea how screwed up our immigration system is. So if the book makes a contribution, I hope it’ll be bringing people up the learning curve. And once they begin to understand how bad things are, they are going to be very receptive to the kinds of solutions we’re proposing.”

The book is heavy on solutions, some good and some bad. The co-authors are right that there should be a “path to permanent legal resident status for those who entered our country illegally as adults and who have committed no additional crimes of significance.” But they’re wrong about inviting local police to play a greater role in enforcing immigration law in the name of states’ rights. They believe the states should have flexibility to lend a hand to the federal government in rounding up illegal immigrants. Yet the courts, in ruling on cases from Arizona and other states, have concluded the best policy for the states is hands-off.

While on tour, Bolick has noticed that when it comes to those folks who disagree with his support for legal status for the undocumented, “the old arguments don’t have the same passion.”

He suggested that many on the right are ready for reform.

“I think there were a lot of Republicans and a lot of conservatives who were already hoping for an immigration solution,” Bolick said. “But they were cowed into submission by the loud, vehement anti-immigration wing of the party. People now feel safe to say out loud what they’ve always thought. They come up to me and say: ‘I agree with you 100 percent. I’ve always felt this way.'”

Conservatives for immigration reform. What a concept. This can’t be an easy road to travel. These folks need a safe haven. This immensely valuable book provides one.

About Author



Related Articles


No Comments Yet!

There are no comments at the moment, do you want to add one?

Write a comment

Write a Comment

The Roundup

<script id="mcjs">!function(c,h,i,m,p){m=c.createElement(h),p=c.getElementsByTagName(h)[0],m.async=1,m.src=i,p.parentNode.insertBefore(m,p)}(document,"script","");</script>

Search Bar

Sidebar Thumbnails Ad

Twitter Feed

North Texas Daily @ntdaily
ICYMI: Football drops C-USA title game versus Texas-San Antonio📝: @justanotherijcRead more:
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
OPINION: You don't have to finish a book you don't enjoy📝: @jackmoraglia 🖼️: Isabella IsquieradoRead more:
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
SPORTS: On point: Huntsberry's influence felt on and off court📝: @jillian_ntd 📸: Marco BarreraRead more:
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
NEWS: North Texas judge blocks student loan forgiveness plan📝: @RealGioDel 📸: Coralynn ColeRead more:
h J R
North Texas Daily @ntdaily
THE DOSE: 'Weird: The Al Yankovic Story' is a perfect parody of musical biopic genre📝: @FernaJustoo 🖼️: @jazminesg_Read more:
h J R

Sidebar Bottom Block Ad

Flytedesk Ad